This is a bit on the extreme end
but this shows how a group of people have no respect for another’s culture. This
article shows Islamic militants destroying Assyrian relics from the old world
with no respect for its origins. This outrage was used to bring up a debate
that artifacts shouldn't be distributed, and if American museums should return Muslim
art to its originated birthplace. The two sides of the argument are that the
artifacts and art are theirs and belong in their cultural, and the other argument
is what James Cuno believes which is “important antiquities should be treated
as the common property of mankind”. I can understand the reasoning on both
sides. I realize that the artifacts weren't originated here and are not a part
of America’s personal culture, but I do believe that having this art in our museums
is good because as a people it is important for us to stay educated with other
cultures and learn about people that are different from ourselves so we are more
aware of the things that inhabit our world instead of staying in a bubble which
many do. This can be related to Injunuity because in it we talked about how a
culture wasn't talked about enough, and here we have a culture that is trying
to be taken away from our museums because it is said it is not “ours”, but I
believe culture is something that should be shared and not just remain in one
place because if it did we would be more ignorant than we already are.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/31/arts/design/islamic-state-destruction-renews-debate-over-repatriation-of-antiquities.html
No comments:
Post a Comment